AMA Guides® Newsletter - Issue Archive

Articles

1. Effects of Aging on Impairment Ratings: Part 1: Internal Medicine Issues

   Stephen L. Demeter

   Pages 3–10

   DOI: 10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2018.SepOct01

   Abstract

   This article is the first of four to explore the effects of age-related changes in impairment evaluations as defined by the fifth and sixth editions of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides). With respect to the cardiovascular system, impairment ratings for the following conditions commonly are affected by the aging process: coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, arrhythmias/dysrhythmias, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease. Impairment ratings in the fifth and sixth editions of the AMA Guides for the pulmonary system apply corrections for age with respect to certain measurements such as forced vital capacity. The normal aging process does not significantly affect impairment ratings for either hematological impairments or the endocrine system, nor does normal aging significantly affect the impairment ratings for mammary glands. With careful attention to the diagnosis and causative factors, evaluators may find that the normal aging process can affect impairment ratings associated with metabolic bone disease. Evaluating physician typically must determine impairment secondary to a specific cause (eg, injury or exposure) and therefore must consider if other factors are contributing to the impairment.
   Show more

2. Shoulder Impairment Rating: Sixth Edition Clarifications (Authoritative Article*)

   J. Mark Melhorn

   Pages 11–15

   DOI: 10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2018.SepOct02

   Abstract

   A request for an impairment rating using both the fourth and sixth editions of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) demonstrated two interesting facts: In the sixth edition, Table 15-34, Shoulder Range of Motion has two typographical errors. First, Grade Modifier 3 (column 6) and the Internal Rotation (IR) (row 12) lists ≤20° ER = 8% UEI; this should be ≥20° ER = 8% UEI; and Grade Modifier 4 (column 7) and IR (row 12) lists: 20° to 50° IR = 6% UEI, ≥60° IR or 10° IR to ER = 0% UEI; this should be ≥60° IR or 10° IR to ER = 10% UEI. Second, the impairment rating using the fourth and sixth editions resulted in the same total impairment. A case example presents a 54-year-old male who experienced a right shoulder strain that was determined to be a right shoulder rotator cuff tear of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. The patient was evaluated for impairment based on the range-of-motion method in the fourth edition of the AMA Guides, and 13% upper extremity impairment was determined. Using the sixth edition produced similar results, demonstrating how similar impairment ratings can be based on the fourth and sixth editions.
   Show more